Attention.tech vs ContactOut

Attention.tech (Web SaaS) and ContactOut (Web SaaS) both compete in Conversational Voice Calling Agents. On pricing, Attention.tech lists Custom / enterprise pricing (no free plan disclosed), whereas ContactOut lists Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan (free plan). Technically, Attention.tech is rated L3 · Conditional automation with a 4.2/5.0 (Proprietary moat) moat, while ContactOut is rated L2 · Workflow copilot with a 3.6/5.0 (Proprietary moat) moat. Corporate profile: Attention.tech (founded 2021, HQ New York, $50.3M funding) vs. ContactOut (founded 2015, HQ San Francisco, California, United States). Both evaluations are human fact-checked by Anna Xia (Oct 14, 2026). At a 5-seat team baseline, Attention.tech starts at Custom quote vs ContactOut at ~$49/mo.

Attention.tech

Attention.tech delivers conversational voice intelligence agents that transcribe sales interactions and automate downstream CRM pipeline hygiene.

5-Seat Floor: Custom quote (Custom / enterprise pricing) · Autonomy: L3 · Conditional automation · Moat: 4.2/5.0 (Proprietary moat)

Target fit: B2B SaaS (Web SaaS)

Read the Attention.tech review →

ContactOut

B2B contact intelligence platform providing verified direct phone numbers and personal email addresses for outbound sales and recruiting teams.

5-Seat Floor: ~$49/mo (Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan) · Autonomy: L2 · Workflow copilot · Moat: 3.6/5.0 (Proprietary moat)

Target fit: B2B SaaS, DTC / eCommerce, Enterprise Brands (Web SaaS)

Read the ContactOut review →

How Attention.tech and ContactOut differ

  • Pricing model: Attention.tech is enterprise / quote, ContactOut is freemium.
  • ContactOut has a free plan; none is recorded for Attention.tech.
  • AI autonomy: Attention.tech is rated L3 · Conditional automation, ContactOut L2 · Workflow copilot on the MarTechRadar scale.
  • Moat score: Attention.tech scores 4.2/5.0 vs. ContactOut at 3.6/5.0 (Proprietary moat).
  • ContactOut was founded earlier (2015) than Attention.tech (2021).
  • Headquarters: Attention.tech in New York, ContactOut in San Francisco, California, United States.
  • Ecosystem stack: Attention.tech connects with Salesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft Teams, Zoom; ContactOut connects with Salesforce, LinkedIn, Twilio Segment.

Computed from the fields below. Only editor-verified ratings and vendor-sourced prices are compared.

When to choose Attention.tech vs ContactOut (and when to walk away)

Choose Attention.tech if

  • Target ICP & Stack Fit: You operate as B2B SaaS requiring a Web SaaS deployment for AI Calling, with verified ecosystem connectivity for Salesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft Teams, Zoom.
  • L3 Architecture & Defensibility: Proprietary semantic extraction workflows tuned to revenue vocabulary combined with automated bidirectional CRM synchronization pipelines.
  • Commercial Model Fit: Your procurement budget aligns with Custom / enterprise pricing.

Walk away from Attention.tech if

  • Walk away if you require transparent self-serve monthly billing or your budget ceiling is under $1,000/mo (Attention.tech requires sales-gated custom quoting).
  • Walk away if your workflow cannot tolerate schema drift vulnerability: Arbitrary additions of custom CRM validation rules frequently trigger silent synchronization failures that require administrative remediation.
  • Walk away if multi-speaker diarization dropouts is a deal-breaker for your team: Dense cross-talk or degraded peripheral audio feeds cause speaker misattribution, distorting conversational sentiment and buyer intent tracking.

Choose ContactOut if

  • Target ICP & Stack Fit: You operate as B2B SaaS, DTC / eCommerce and Enterprise Brands requiring a Web SaaS deployment for AI Calling, with verified ecosystem connectivity for Salesforce, LinkedIn, Twilio Segment.
  • L2 Architecture & Defensibility: Proprietary contact database indexing over 350 million professional profiles paired with real-time email verification pipelines and browser-integrated overlay ingestion.
  • Commercial Model Fit: Your procurement budget aligns with Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan and want a self-serve free tier for zero-cost initial validation.

Walk away from ContactOut if

  • Walk away if your workflow requires uncapped enterprise volume on the Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan entry plan without upgrading tiers.
  • Walk away if your workflow cannot tolerate platform dependency: The client extension relies on DOM parsing across third-party social networks, introducing vulnerability to target site markup updates that can interrupt workflow scraping.
  • Walk away if verification decay is a deal-breaker for your team: Personal mobile numbers and personal email addresses experience natural telemetry decay, requiring periodic re-validation to avoid outbound bounce penalties.

Side-by-side facts

FieldAttention.techContactOut
SubtrackConversational Voice Calling AgentsConversational Voice Calling Agents
PricingCustom / enterprise pricingFree plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan
Pricing modelEnterprise / quoteFreemium
Published pricing tiersEnterprise / Custom (Custom quote)Free / Sandbox ($0) · Entry / Starter ($49/mo) · Growth / Professional ($99/mo) · Plus ($199/mo)
Free accessNo free plan disclosedFree plan
Enterprise planYesYes
AI autonomy levelL3 · Conditional automationL2 · Workflow copilot
Moat tier & score4.2 / 5.0 · Proprietary moat3.6 / 5.0 · Proprietary moat
DeliveryWeb SaaSWeb SaaS
AudienceB2B SaaSB2B SaaS, DTC / eCommerce, Enterprise Brands
Ecosystem integrationsSalesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft Teams, ZoomSalesforce, LinkedIn, Twilio Segment
Compliance & governance—GDPR, CCPA
Funding & backing$50.3MVenture-backed
FoundersAnis Bennaceur, Matthias WickenburgPeter Deng, Rob Liu
Company size51-200 employees51-200 employees
Founded20212015
HeadquartersNew YorkSan Francisco, California, United States
Fact-checkedAnna Xia, Oct 14, 2026Anna Xia, Oct 14, 2026
Governance & docs—Terms ↗
AI Head-to-Head Procurement Simulator · Evidence-Locked Dossier

Attention.tech vs ContactOut: TCO & constraint stress test

Test how both tools behave under your team size, monthly budget ceiling, CRM ecosystem, and governance guardrails.

1. Team / Seat Scale
2. Monthly Budget Ceiling
3. Primary Stack
4. Guardrail
Under a 5-seat / $800/mo profile, ContactOut carries lower procurement friction (Conditional Fit · Contract & Stack Caveats) than Attention.tech (High Deal-Risk · Constraint Mismatch).

Attention.tech

High Deal-Risk · Constraint Mismatch
Estimated Floor (5 Seats · Enterprise / Custom)Custom Quote (Custom / enterprise pricing)Vendor does not publish a self-serve USD floor on its pricing page; requires sales qualification.Sales-gated pricing vs. $800/mo cap (High quote risk)
  • Opaque Enterprise Quoting vs. SMB/Mid-Market Budget: Attention.tech does not disclose a public self-serve floor (Custom / enterprise pricing). Buyers with a $800/mo cap face high sales-qualification friction.
  • Sales-Gated Contract Terms: Attention.tech distributes its software through a direct enterprise licensing model. Commercial pricing is available on request through tailored enterprise sales quotes based on organizational scale and seats.
  • Primary Operational Bottleneck: Schema drift vulnerability: Arbitrary additions of custom CRM validation rules frequently trigger silent synchronization failures that require administrative remediation.

Walk-Away Rule: Walk away if you require transparent self-serve monthly billing or your budget ceiling is under $1,000/mo (Attention.tech requires sales-gated custom quoting).

Negotiation Lever: Demand a 30- to 60-day paid pilot opt-out clause in the Attention.tech order form before signing a 12-month enterprise commitment.

ContactOut

Conditional Fit · Contract & Stack Caveats
Estimated Floor (5 Seats · Enterprise / Custom)Custom Quote (Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan)Vendor does not publish a self-serve USD floor on its pricing page; requires sales qualification.Sales-gated pricing vs. $800/mo cap (High quote risk)
  • Opaque Enterprise Quoting vs. SMB/Mid-Market Budget: ContactOut does not disclose a public self-serve floor (Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan). Buyers with a $800/mo cap face high sales-qualification friction.
  • Published Self-Serve Entry Floor: ContactOut publishes a transparent entry point (Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan) with a free tier for initial validation before committing.
  • Tier Fit for 5-Seat Scale: Entry / Starter ($49/mo): 300 exports / month
  • Primary Operational Bottleneck: Single-Seat Isolation: Standard commercial tiers restrict usage to single-seat allocations per company, imposing governance overhead for larger sales teams coordinating shared enrichment budgets.

Walk-Away Rule: Walk away if your workflow requires uncapped enterprise volume on the Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan entry plan without upgrading tiers.

Negotiation Lever: Validate exact quota thresholds (seats, credits, or API calls) included in ContactOut's Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan tier before converting from monthly to annual billing.

Interactive Head-to-Head Scenario Red-Teamer · Fact-Gate Verified

Limitations

Attention.tech

Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Schema drift vulnerability: Arbitrary additions of custom CRM validation rules frequently trigger silent synchronization failures that require administrative remediation.
Full limitations in the Attention.tech review

ContactOut

Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Platform Dependency: The client extension relies on DOM parsing across third-party social networks, introducing vulnerability to target site markup updates that can interrupt workflow scraping.
Full limitations in the ContactOut review

Pricing notes & tier schedules

Attention.tech: Custom / enterprise pricing

Attention.tech distributes its software through a direct enterprise licensing model. Commercial pricing is available on request through tailored enterprise sales quotes based on organizational scale and seats.
Verified tier schedule:
  • Enterprise / Custom (Custom quote, 15–50+ seats (Enterprise SLA)): Sales-negotiated annual contract for custom volume, SSO/RBAC governance, and dedicated SLA.
Hidden TCO drivers to audit:
  • Schema drift vulnerability: Arbitrary additions of custom CRM validation rules frequently trigger silent synchronization failures that require administrative remediation.
  • Multi-speaker diarization dropouts: Dense cross-talk or degraded peripheral audio feeds cause speaker misattribution, distorting conversational sentiment and buyer intent tracking.
Pricing details in the Attention.tech review

ContactOut: Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan

ContactOut packages its dataset across tiered subscriptions governed by search volumes and data attribute access. Entry-level usage begins on a free tier at $0 per month, which provisions five emails and phone numbers daily.
Verified tier schedule:
  • Free / Sandbox ($0, 1–2 seats (Evaluation)): Entry free tier with capped usage or feature quotas for initial workflow testing.
  • Entry / Starter ($49/mo, 1–2 seats): 300 exports / month
  • Growth / Professional ($99/mo, 5 seats): 300 exports / month
  • Plus ($199/mo, 15 seats): Email + Phone
Hidden TCO drivers to audit:
  • Platform Dependency: The client extension relies on DOM parsing across third-party social networks, introducing vulnerability to target site markup updates that can interrupt workflow scraping.
  • Verification Decay: Personal mobile numbers and personal email addresses experience natural telemetry decay, requiring periodic re-validation to avoid outbound bounce penalties.
Pricing details in the ContactOut review

ContactOut pricing page

Frequently asked questions: Attention.tech vs ContactOut

How does Attention.tech pricing compare to ContactOut in 2026?

Attention.tech is listed at Custom / enterprise pricing (enterprise / quote, no free plan disclosed), whereas ContactOut is listed at Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan (freemium, free plan).

How do Attention.tech and ContactOut compare on AI autonomy and moat depth?

On the MarTechRadar L1–L5 scale, Attention.tech is rated L3 · Conditional automation with a Proprietary moat moat (4.2/5.0), while ContactOut is rated L2 · Workflow copilot with a Proprietary moat moat (3.6/5.0).

Which teams are Attention.tech and ContactOut built for?

Attention.tech is a Web SaaS product in Conversational Voice Calling Agents designed for B2B SaaS. ContactOut is a Web SaaS product in Conversational Voice Calling Agents designed for B2B SaaS, DTC / eCommerce, Enterprise Brands.

What are the main limitations of Attention.tech vs ContactOut?

For Attention.tech: Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Schema drift vulnerability: Arbitrary additions of custom CRM validation rules frequently trigger silent synchronization failures that require administrative remediation. For ContactOut: Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Platform Dependency: The client extension relies on DOM parsing across third-party social networks, introducing vulnerability to target site markup updates that can interrupt workflow scraping.

What are the hidden TCO drivers and contract negotiation levers for Attention.tech vs ContactOut?

For Attention.tech: Schema drift vulnerability (Arbitrary additions of custom CRM validation rules frequently trigger silent synchronization failures that require administrative remediation.) Negotiation lever: Demand a 30- to 60-day paid pilot opt-out clause in the Attention.tech order form before signing a 12-month enterprise commitment. For ContactOut: Platform Dependency (The client extension relies on DOM parsing across third-party social networks, introducing vulnerability to target site markup updates that can interrupt workflow scraping.) Negotiation lever: Validate exact quota thresholds (seats, credits, or API calls) included in ContactOut's Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan tier before converting from monthly to annual billing.

Excerpts are quoted verbatim from each fact-checked review. Last updated Oct 14, 2026.