Gravitas.io vs Haku AI
Both tools are listed under Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs, and both have been fact-checked by a named editor. This page lines up their structured data and quotes each review’s limitations and pricing notes; it does not pick a winner.
Gravitas.io
Autonomous B2B outbound pipeline generation platform combining AI agent workflows with senior sales development oversight for enterprise revenue teams.
Pricing: Custom / enterprise pricing · Autonomy: L3 · Conditional automation · Moat: 3.6/5.0 (Proprietary moat)
Target fit: B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps) (Web SaaS)
Haku AI
Signal-based autonomous B2B sales agent platform executing contextual prospect research, buying signal monitoring, and pipeline outbound automation.
Pricing: Custom / enterprise pricing · Autonomy: L3 · Conditional automation · Moat: 3.6/5.0 (Proprietary moat)
Target fit: B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps) (Web SaaS)
How Gravitas.io and Haku AI differ
- Gravitas.io was founded earlier (2019) than Haku AI (2025).
- Headquarters: Gravitas.io in London, Greater London, Haku AI in London.
Computed from the fields below. Only editor-verified ratings and vendor-sourced prices are compared.
Side-by-side facts
| Field | Gravitas.io | Haku AI |
|---|---|---|
| Subtrack | Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs | Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs |
| Pricing | Custom / enterprise pricing | Custom / enterprise pricing |
| Pricing model | Enterprise / quote | Enterprise / quote |
| Free access | No free plan disclosed | No free plan disclosed |
| Enterprise plan | Yes | Yes |
| AI autonomy level | L3 · Conditional automation | L3 · Conditional automation |
| Moat tier | Proprietary moat | Proprietary moat |
| Delivery | Web SaaS | Web SaaS |
| Audience | B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps) | B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps) |
| Headquarters | London, Greater London | London |
| Fact-checked | Vasilia Xia, Oct 15, 2026 | Jagmeet Sine, Oct 14, 2026 |
Gravitas.io vs Haku AI: TCO & constraint stress test
Test how both tools behave under your team size, monthly budget ceiling, CRM ecosystem, and governance guardrails.
Gravitas.io
High Deal-Risk · Constraint Mismatch- Opaque Enterprise Quoting vs. SMB/Mid-Market Budget: Gravitas.io does not disclose a public self-serve floor (Custom / enterprise pricing). Buyers with a $800/mo cap face high sales-qualification friction.
- Sales-Gated Contract Terms: Gravitas.io operates under a tailored enterprise procurement model without publicly listed baseline tiers. Commercial pricing is available on request through tailored enterprise sales quotes based on organizational scale, outbound volume parameters, and target market complexity.
- Primary Operational Bottleneck: Throughput Scaling Bottlenecks: Because the platform couples programmatic execution with senior-level human oversight for nuanced positioning, outbound cadence volume cannot scale arbitrarily fast like fully headless mass-messaging tools.
Walk-Away Rule: Walk away if you require transparent self-serve monthly billing or your budget ceiling is under $1,000/mo (Gravitas.io requires sales-gated custom quoting).
Negotiation Lever: Demand a 30- to 60-day paid pilot opt-out clause in the Gravitas.io order form before signing a 12-month enterprise commitment.
Haku AI
High Deal-Risk · Constraint Mismatch- Opaque Enterprise Quoting vs. SMB/Mid-Market Budget: Haku AI does not disclose a public self-serve floor (Custom / enterprise pricing). Buyers with a $800/mo cap face high sales-qualification friction.
- Sales-Gated Contract Terms: Commercial access operates under custom enterprise pricing available on request through tailored sales quotes based on organizational deployment scale, seat counts, and monitored signal volume.
- Primary Operational Bottleneck: Signal Ingestion Latency: Unstructured web signal monitoring introduces processing delays when target accounts limit external crawl indexing or deploy anti-scraping defenses.
Walk-Away Rule: Walk away if you require transparent self-serve monthly billing or your budget ceiling is under $1,000/mo (Haku AI requires sales-gated custom quoting).
Negotiation Lever: Demand a 30- to 60-day paid pilot opt-out clause in the Haku AI order form before signing a 12-month enterprise commitment.
Limitations
Gravitas.io
Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Throughput Scaling Bottlenecks: Because the platform couples programmatic execution with senior-level human oversight for nuanced positioning, outbound cadence volume cannot scale arbitrarily fast like fully headless mass-messaging tools.Full limitations in the Gravitas.io review
Haku AI
Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Signal Ingestion Latency: Unstructured web signal monitoring introduces processing delays when target accounts limit external crawl indexing or deploy anti-scraping defenses.Full limitations in the Haku AI review
Pricing notes
Gravitas.io: Custom / enterprise pricing
Gravitas.io operates under a tailored enterprise procurement model without publicly listed baseline tiers. Commercial pricing is available on request through tailored enterprise sales quotes based on organizational scale, outbound volume parameters, and target market complexity.Pricing details in the Gravitas.io review
Haku AI: Custom / enterprise pricing
Commercial access operates under custom enterprise pricing available on request through tailored sales quotes based on organizational deployment scale, seat counts, and monitored signal volume.Pricing details in the Haku AI review
Frequently asked questions: Gravitas.io vs Haku AI
How does Gravitas.io pricing compare to Haku AI in 2026?
Gravitas.io is listed at Custom / enterprise pricing (enterprise / quote, no free plan disclosed), whereas Haku AI is listed at Custom / enterprise pricing (enterprise / quote, no free plan disclosed).
How do Gravitas.io and Haku AI compare on AI autonomy and moat depth?
On the MarTechRadar L1–L5 scale, Gravitas.io is rated L3 · Conditional automation with a Proprietary moat moat (3.6/5.0), while Haku AI is rated L3 · Conditional automation with a Proprietary moat moat (3.6/5.0).
Which teams are Gravitas.io and Haku AI built for?
Gravitas.io is a Web SaaS product in Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs designed for B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps). Haku AI is a Web SaaS product in Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs designed for B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps).
What are the main limitations of Gravitas.io vs Haku AI?
For Gravitas.io: Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Throughput Scaling Bottlenecks: Because the platform couples programmatic execution with senior-level human oversight for nuanced positioning, outbound cadence volume cannot scale arbitrarily fast like fully headless mass-messaging tools. For Haku AI: Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Signal Ingestion Latency: Unstructured web signal monitoring introduces processing delays when target accounts limit external crawl indexing or deploy anti-scraping defenses.
Excerpts are quoted verbatim from each fact-checked review. Last updated Oct 15, 2026.