Attio vs Rox
Both tools are listed under Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs, and both have been fact-checked by a named editor. This page lines up their structured data and quotes each review’s limitations and pricing notes; it does not pick a winner.
Attio
AI-native CRM and agentic revenue orchestration platform combining dynamic data modeling with automated outbound and inbound sales workflows.
Pricing: $44–$99/seat/mo · Autonomy: L3 · Conditional automation · Moat: 3.5/5.0 (Proprietary moat)
Target fit: B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps) (Web SaaS)
Rox
Autonomous revenue agents designed for the Global 2000 and growth-stage sales teams to automate pipeline discovery, account research, and multi-channel.
Pricing: $100–$255/mo · Autonomy: L3 · Conditional automation · Moat: 3.5/5.0 (Proprietary moat)
Target fit: B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps) (Web SaaS)
How Attio and Rox differ
- Pricing model: Attio is per seat, Rox is subscription.
- Entry price: Attio starts lower ($44–$99/seat/mo) than Rox ($100–$255/mo).
- Attio was founded earlier (2019) than Rox (2024).
- Headquarters: Attio in London, United Kingdom, Rox in San Francisco, California.
Computed from the fields below. Only editor-verified ratings and vendor-sourced prices are compared.
Side-by-side facts
| Field | Attio | Rox |
|---|---|---|
| Subtrack | Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs | Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs |
| Pricing | $44–$99/seat/mo | $100–$255/mo |
| Pricing model | Per seat | Subscription |
| Free access | No free plan disclosed | No free plan disclosed |
| Enterprise plan | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| AI autonomy level | L3 · Conditional automation | L3 · Conditional automation |
| Moat tier | Proprietary moat | Proprietary moat |
| Delivery | Web SaaS | Web SaaS |
| Audience | B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps) | B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps) |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | San Francisco, California |
| Fact-checked | Jiacky Lee, Oct 10, 2026 | Jiacky Lee, Oct 10, 2026 |
Attio vs Rox: TCO & constraint stress test
Test how both tools behave under your team size, monthly budget ceiling, CRM ecosystem, and governance guardrails.
Attio
Low Procurement Risk · Strong Fit- Published Self-Serve Entry Floor: Attio publishes a transparent entry point ($44–$99/seat/mo) for initial validation before committing.
- Linear Per-Seat Scaling (5 Seats × $44/seat/mo): Base license scales linearly with operator headcount ($220/mo for 5 seats on Entry / Starter).
- Primary Operational Bottleneck: API Ingestion Limits: High-volume external API syncing faces throughput throttling during bulk backfills, delaying historical message indexing across substantial legacy inboxes.
Walk-Away Rule: Walk away if your workflow requires uncapped enterprise volume on the $44–$99/seat/mo entry plan without upgrading tiers.
Negotiation Lever: Validate exact quota thresholds (seats, credits, or API calls) included in Attio's $44–$99/seat/mo tier before converting from monthly to annual billing.
Rox
Low Procurement Risk · Strong Fit- Published Self-Serve Entry Floor: Rox publishes a transparent entry point ($100–$255/mo) for initial validation before committing.
- Tier Fit for 5-Seat Scale: Teams ($255/mo): For smaller teams that want to streamline research, outreach, and deal management across their
- Primary Operational Bottleneck: Domain Warming and Reputation Overhead: High-volume autonomous outbound generation introduces severe domain reputation hazards, requiring teams to continuously maintain external secondary domains, DNS records, and warming schedules.
Walk-Away Rule: Walk away if your workflow requires uncapped enterprise volume on the $100–$255/mo entry plan without upgrading tiers.
Negotiation Lever: Validate exact quota thresholds (seats, credits, or API calls) included in Rox's $100–$255/mo tier before converting from monthly to annual billing.
Limitations
Attio
Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: API Ingestion Limits: High-volume external API syncing faces throughput throttling during bulk backfills, delaying historical message indexing across substantial legacy inboxes.Full limitations in the Attio review
Rox
Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Domain Warming and Reputation Overhead: High-volume autonomous outbound generation introduces severe domain reputation hazards, requiring teams to continuously maintain external secondary domains, DNS records, and warming schedules.Full limitations in the Rox review
Pricing notes
Attio: $44–$99/seat/mo
Attio utilizes a tiered seat-based subscription model. A free tier is offered at $0 per user/month for individuals exploring core capabilities. Scaled commercial access starts with the Plus tier at $44 per user/month for growing teams requiring private lists and expanded email volume.Pricing details in the Attio review
Rox: $100–$255/mo
Commercial access to Rox follows a tier-based software subscription model tied directly to monthly agent operational quotas. Entry-level deployment for individual sales professionals starts at $100 per month, granting access to core research tools and up to 10,000 monthly actions.Pricing details in the Rox review
Frequently asked questions: Attio vs Rox
How does Attio pricing compare to Rox in 2026?
Attio is listed at $44–$99/seat/mo (per seat, no free plan disclosed), whereas Rox is listed at $100–$255/mo (subscription, no free plan disclosed).
How do Attio and Rox compare on AI autonomy and moat depth?
On the MarTechRadar L1–L5 scale, Attio is rated L3 · Conditional automation with a Proprietary moat moat (3.5/5.0), while Rox is rated L3 · Conditional automation with a Proprietary moat moat (3.5/5.0).
Which teams are Attio and Rox built for?
Attio is a Web SaaS product in Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs designed for B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps). Rox is a Web SaaS product in Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs designed for B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps).
What are the main limitations of Attio vs Rox?
For Attio: Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: API Ingestion Limits: High-volume external API syncing faces throughput throttling during bulk backfills, delaying historical message indexing across substantial legacy inboxes. For Rox: Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Domain Warming and Reputation Overhead: High-volume autonomous outbound generation introduces severe domain reputation hazards, requiring teams to continuously maintain external secondary domains, DNS records, and warming schedules.
Excerpts are quoted verbatim from each fact-checked review. Last updated Oct 10, 2026.