Firmable vs Lusha

Firmable is listed under Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs and Lusha under Lead Enrichment & Waterfall Orchestration, and both have been fact-checked by a named editor. This page lines up their structured data and quotes each review’s limitations and pricing notes; it does not pick a winner.

Firmable

AI-native B2B sales intelligence and autonomous pipeline development platform integrating regional company data registries directly into modern LLM.

Pricing: From $55/mo · Autonomy: L3 · Conditional automation · Moat: 4.2/5.0 (Proprietary moat)

Target fit: B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps) (Web SaaS)

Read the Firmable review

Lusha

B2B intelligence platform delivering verified direct dials, work emails, and firmographic enrichment via browser extensions, APIs, and AI integrations.

Pricing: Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan · Autonomy: L2 · Workflow copilot · Moat: 4.4/5.0 (Proprietary moat (category leader))

Target fit: B2B SaaS, DTC / eCommerce, Enterprise Brands (Browser Extension)

Read the Lusha review

How Firmable and Lusha differ

  • Firmable is listed under Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs; Lusha under Lead Enrichment & Waterfall Orchestration.
  • Pricing model: Firmable is subscription, Lusha is freemium.
  • Lusha has a free plan; none is recorded for Firmable.
  • AI autonomy: Firmable is rated L3 · Conditional automation, Lusha L2 · Workflow copilot on the MarTechRadar scale.
  • Moat tier: Lusha is rated Proprietary moat (category leader), Firmable Proprietary moat.
  • Delivery: Firmable is a Web SaaS product; Lusha is a Browser Extension product.
  • Lusha was founded earlier (2016) than Firmable (2023).
  • Headquarters: Firmable in Melbourne, Lusha in Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Audience: Firmable targets B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps); Lusha targets B2B SaaS, DTC / eCommerce, Enterprise Brands.

Computed from the fields below. Only editor-verified ratings and vendor-sourced prices are compared.

Side-by-side facts

FieldFirmableLusha
SubtrackAutonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRsLead Enrichment & Waterfall Orchestration
PricingFrom $55/moFree plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan
Pricing modelSubscriptionFreemium
Free accessNo free plan disclosedFree plan
Enterprise planNot recordedYes
AI autonomy levelL3 · Conditional automationL2 · Workflow copilot
Moat tierProprietary moatProprietary moat (category leader)
DeliveryWeb SaaSBrowser Extension
AudienceB2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps)B2B SaaS, DTC / eCommerce, Enterprise Brands
HeadquartersMelbourneTel Aviv, Israel
Fact-checkedJagmeet Sine, Oct 12, 2026Jiacky Lee, Oct 4, 2026
AI Head-to-Head Procurement Simulator · Evidence-Locked Dossier

Firmable vs Lusha: TCO & constraint stress test

Test how both tools behave under your team size, monthly budget ceiling, CRM ecosystem, and governance guardrails.

1. Team / Seat Scale
2. Monthly Budget Ceiling
3. Primary Stack
4. Guardrail
Under a 5-seat / $800/mo profile, Firmable carries lower procurement friction (Low Procurement Risk · Strong Fit) than Lusha (Conditional Fit · Contract & Stack Caveats). Firmable publishes a self-serve floor (From $55/mo), whereas Lusha requires a custom quote (Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan).

Firmable

Low Procurement Risk · Strong Fit
Estimated Floor (5 Seats · Teams)$75 / mo ($900 / yr on Teams)Stepped to Teams ($75/mo) for 5-seat team capacity (entry tier starts at $55/mo).Fits within $800/mo cap (9% of ceiling at base floor)
  • Published Self-Serve Entry Floor: Firmable publishes a transparent entry point (From $55/mo) for initial validation before committing.
  • Tier Fit for 5-Seat Scale: Teams ($75/mo): Perfect for small teams looking to scale up their growth
  • Primary Operational Bottleneck: Regional Data Skew: While registry coverage is dense across Australia, Canada, and the United States, coverage degrades significantly in non-English emerging markets where public corporate filings lack standardized machine-readable interfaces.

Walk-Away Rule: Walk away if your workflow requires uncapped enterprise volume on the From $55/mo entry plan without upgrading tiers.

Negotiation Lever: Validate exact quota thresholds (seats, credits, or API calls) included in Firmable's From $55/mo tier before converting from monthly to annual billing.

Lusha

Conditional Fit · Contract & Stack Caveats
Estimated Floor (5 Seats · Enterprise / Custom)Custom Quote (Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan)Vendor does not publish a self-serve USD floor on its pricing page; requires sales qualification.Sales-gated pricing vs. $800/mo cap (High quote risk)
  • Opaque Enterprise Quoting vs. SMB/Mid-Market Budget: Lusha does not disclose a public self-serve floor (Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan). Buyers with a $800/mo cap face high sales-qualification friction.
  • Published Self-Serve Entry Floor: Lusha publishes a transparent entry point (Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan) with a free tier for initial validation before committing.
  • Tier Fit for 5-Seat Scale: Entry / Starter ($37/mo): Verified $37/mo published rate on vendor pricing schedule.
  • Primary Operational Bottleneck: Direct-Dial Decay: Mobile number accuracy degrades rapidly in volatile turnover sectors, requiring manual validation when contact records drift past thirty-day refresh cycles.

Walk-Away Rule: Walk away if your workflow requires uncapped enterprise volume on the Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan entry plan without upgrading tiers.

Negotiation Lever: Validate exact quota thresholds (seats, credits, or API calls) included in Lusha's Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan tier before converting from monthly to annual billing.

Interactive Head-to-Head Scenario Red-Teamer · Fact-Gate Verified

Limitations

Firmable

Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Regional Data Skew: While registry coverage is dense across Australia, Canada, and the United States, coverage degrades significantly in non-English emerging markets where public corporate filings lack standardized machine-readable interfaces.
Full limitations in the Firmable review

Lusha

Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Direct-Dial Decay: Mobile number accuracy degrades rapidly in volatile turnover sectors, requiring manual validation when contact records drift past thirty-day refresh cycles.
Full limitations in the Lusha review

Pricing notes

Firmable: From $55/mo

Commercial access is structured via tiered self-serve subscriptions alongside custom commercial agreements. Public self-serve tiers start from $55/month for individual operators, providing basic export allowances and verified contact credits.
Pricing details in the Firmable review

Firmable pricing page

Lusha: Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan

The commercial framework employs credit-metered licensing based on contact reveals and export quotas. Lusha provides a permanent entry tier starting at $0 per month for basic individual evaluation with restricted monthly credits.
Pricing details in the Lusha review

Lusha pricing page

Frequently asked questions: Firmable vs Lusha

How does Firmable pricing compare to Lusha in 2026?

Firmable is listed at From $55/mo (subscription, no free plan disclosed), whereas Lusha is listed at Free plan · $0/mo · Enterprise plan (freemium, free plan).

How do Firmable and Lusha compare on AI autonomy and moat depth?

On the MarTechRadar L1–L5 scale, Firmable is rated L3 · Conditional automation with a Proprietary moat moat (4.2/5.0), while Lusha is rated L2 · Workflow copilot with a Proprietary moat (category leader) moat (4.4/5.0).

Which teams are Firmable and Lusha built for?

Firmable is a Web SaaS product in Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs designed for B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps). Lusha is a Browser Extension product in Lead Enrichment & Waterfall Orchestration designed for B2B SaaS, DTC / eCommerce, Enterprise Brands.

What are the main limitations of Firmable vs Lusha?

For Firmable: Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Regional Data Skew: While registry coverage is dense across Australia, Canada, and the United States, coverage degrades significantly in non-English emerging markets where public corporate filings lack standardized machine-readable interfaces. For Lusha: Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Direct-Dial Decay: Mobile number accuracy degrades rapidly in volatile turnover sectors, requiring manual validation when contact records drift past thirty-day refresh cycles.

Excerpts are quoted verbatim from each fact-checked review. Last updated Oct 12, 2026.