Centralize vs Fastyr
Reviewed by MarTechRadar Research Desk. Pricing & entity snapshots verified Oct 14, 2026.
Centralize (Web SaaS) and Fastyr (Web SaaS) both compete in Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs. On pricing, Centralize lists Free plan · From $49/mo (free plan), whereas Fastyr lists From $1,200/yr (no free plan disclosed). Technically, Centralize is rated L3 · Conditional automation with a 3.5/5.0 (Proprietary moat) moat, while Fastyr is rated L3 · Conditional automation with a 2.9/5.0 (Workflow-embedded) moat. Corporate profile: Centralize (founded 2023, HQ San Francisco, California, United States, $19.5M funding) vs. Fastyr (founded 2024, HQ West Hollywood, California, United States). Verified by the MarTechRadar Research Desk (Oct 12, 2026 for Centralize; Oct 14, 2026 for Fastyr). At a 5-seat team baseline, Centralize starts at ~$245/mo vs Fastyr at ~$100/mo (base).
Centralize
Centralize is an AI relationship workspace that constructs automated account maps, tracks enterprise buying committees, and uncovers warm introduction.
5-Seat Floor: ~$245/mo (Free plan · From $49/mo) · Autonomy: L3 · Conditional automation · Moat: 3.5/5.0 (Proprietary moat)
Target fit: B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps) (Web SaaS)
Fastyr
Fastyr deploys prebuilt autonomous AI sales agents designed to execute outbound prospect engagement, pipeline research, and automated lead development.
5-User Team Cost: ~$100/mo (base) (From $1,200/yr) · Autonomy: L3 · Conditional automation · Moat: 2.9/5.0 (Workflow-embedded)
Target fit: B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps) (Web SaaS)
How Centralize and Fastyr differ
- Pricing model: Centralize is freemium, Fastyr is subscription.
- Entry price: Centralize starts lower (Free plan · From $49/mo) than Fastyr (From $1,200/yr).
- Centralize has a free plan; none is recorded for Fastyr.
- Moat tier: Centralize is rated Proprietary moat, Fastyr Workflow-embedded.
- Centralize was founded earlier (2023) than Fastyr (2024).
- Headquarters: Centralize in San Francisco, California, United States, Fastyr in West Hollywood, California, United States.
- Funding stage: Centralize is Series A; Fastyr is Seed.
- Company headcount: Centralize is 11-50 employees; Fastyr is 2-10 employees.
- Ecosystem stack: Centralize connects with Google Workspace, LinkedIn, Twilio Segment; Fastyr connects with HubSpot, Outreach, Slack, Notion.
Computed from the fields below. Only editor-verified ratings and vendor-sourced prices are compared.
When to choose Centralize vs Fastyr (and when to walk away)
Choose Centralize if
- Target ICP & Stack Fit: You operate as B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams and Revenue Operations (RevOps) requiring a Web SaaS deployment for AI SDR, with verified ecosystem connectivity for Google Workspace, LinkedIn, Twilio Segment.
- L3 Architecture & Defensibility: Moat rests on persistent entity-resolution across corporate communication silos, syncing LinkedIn graphs, calendar metadata, and CRM records into dynamic buying-committee hierarchies.
- Commercial Model Fit: Your procurement budget aligns with Free plan · From $49/mo and want a self-serve free tier for zero-cost initial validation.
Walk away from Centralize if
- Walk away if your workflow requires uncapped enterprise volume on the Free plan · From $49/mo entry plan without upgrading tiers.
- Walk away if your workflow cannot tolerate social graph freshness: LinkedIn synchronization depends on Chrome extensions and user-initiated authentications, creating stale network graphs whenever reps fail to refresh individual browser sessions.
- Walk away if hierarchy inference ambiguity is a deal-breaker for your team: Automated reporting structures struggle in matrixed or decentralized enterprises, requiring manual user intervention to correct cross-functional reporting lines.
Choose Fastyr if
- Target ICP & Stack Fit: You operate as B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams and Revenue Operations (RevOps) requiring a Web SaaS deployment for AI SDR, with verified ecosystem connectivity for HubSpot, Outreach, Slack, Notion.
- L3 Architecture & Defensibility: Fastyr relies on modular agent role templates paired with managed compute and credit allocations, though sustained defensibility remains dependent on proprietary task execution loops and deep CRM integration depth.
- Commercial Model Fit: Your procurement budget aligns with From $1,200/yr.
Walk away from Fastyr if
- Walk away if your team is at early validation stage with a <$250/mo tool budget (Fastyr starts at From $1,200/yr before seat or usage expansion).
- Walk away if your workflow cannot tolerate credit consumption boundaries: Agent operations remain strictly bounded by allocated computational credit pools, requiring supplemental credit packs or plan upgrades when high-volume campaigns encounter unexpected verification loops.
- Walk away if catalog rigidity is a deal-breaker for your team: Pre-configured agent personas restrict rapid structural customization for hyper-niche industry verticals that require specialized regulatory checks or bespoke CRM workflows.
Side-by-side facts
| Field | Centralize | Fastyr |
|---|---|---|
| Subtrack | Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs | Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs |
| Pricing | Free plan · From $49/mo | From $1,200/yr |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Subscription |
| Published pricing tiers | Free / Sandbox ($0) · Pro ($49/mo) | — |
| Free access | Free plan | No free plan disclosed |
| Enterprise plan | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| AI autonomy level | L3 · Conditional automation | L3 · Conditional automation |
| Moat tier & score | 3.5 / 5.0 · Proprietary moat | 2.9 / 5.0 · Workflow-embedded |
| Delivery | Web SaaS | Web SaaS |
| Audience | B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps) | B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps) |
| Ecosystem integrations | Google Workspace, LinkedIn, Twilio Segment | HubSpot, Outreach, Slack, Notion, Stripe |
| Funding & backing | $19.5M · Backed by New Enterprise Associates | Seed |
| Founders | Rachit Kataria, William Wang | Damon Guzman |
| Company size | 11-50 employees | 2-10 employees |
| Founded | 2023 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | West Hollywood, California, United States |
| Fact-checked | MarTechRadar Research Desk, Oct 12, 2026 | MarTechRadar Research Desk, Oct 14, 2026 |
| Governance & docs | Trust & Security ↗ · Terms ↗ · Privacy ↗ | Trust & Security ↗ · Terms ↗ · Privacy ↗ |
Centralize vs Fastyr: TCO & constraint stress test
Test how both tools behave under your team size, monthly budget ceiling, CRM ecosystem, and governance guardrails.
Centralize
Low Procurement Risk · Strong Fit- Published Self-Serve Entry Floor: Centralize publishes a transparent entry point (Free plan · From $49/mo) with a free tier for initial validation before committing.
- Linear Per-Seat Scaling (5 Seats × $49/seat/mo): Base license scales linearly with operator headcount ($245/mo for 5 seats on Pro).
- Primary Operational Bottleneck: Social Graph Freshness: LinkedIn synchronization depends on Chrome extensions and user-initiated authentications, creating stale network graphs whenever reps fail to refresh individual browser sessions.
Walk-Away Rule: Walk away if your workflow requires uncapped enterprise volume on the Free plan · From $49/mo entry plan without upgrading tiers.
Negotiation Lever: Validate exact quota thresholds (seats, credits, or API calls) included in Centralize's Free plan · From $49/mo tier before converting from monthly to annual billing.
Fastyr
Conditional Fit · Contract & Stack Caveats- Annual Contract Lock-in Risk Detected: Commercial procurement for Fastyr begins from $1200/year, with operational pricing structured around managed workspace tiers.
- Primary Operational Bottleneck: Credit Consumption Boundaries: Agent operations remain strictly bounded by allocated computational credit pools, requiring supplemental credit packs or plan upgrades when high-volume campaigns encounter unexpected verification loops.
Walk-Away Rule: Walk away if your team is at early validation stage with a <$250/mo tool budget (Fastyr starts at From $1,200/yr before seat or usage expansion).
Negotiation Lever: Negotiate price-lock protection on additional seats and overage credits above the From $1,200/yr entry tier.
Limitations
Centralize
Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Social Graph Freshness: LinkedIn synchronization depends on Chrome extensions and user-initiated authentications, creating stale network graphs whenever reps fail to refresh individual browser sessions.Full limitations in the Centralize review
Fastyr
Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Credit Consumption Boundaries: Agent operations remain strictly bounded by allocated computational credit pools, requiring supplemental credit packs or plan upgrades when high-volume campaigns encounter unexpected verification loops.Full limitations in the Fastyr review
Official vendor architectural differentiators & migration proof
To help buyers evaluate real-world switching costs, verified founders, solutions architects, and PMMs at both Centralize and Fastyr can submit up to 3 evidence-backed architectural differentiators or verified customer migration case studies.
Why teams choose Centralize over Fastyr
Work at Centralize? Verify your official domain email to publish 3 technical differentiators, migration benchmarks, or a head-to-head buyer sandbox offer on this comparison page:
+ Submit Centralize Official Differentiators & Case Study →Why teams choose Fastyr over Centralize
Work at Fastyr? Verify your official domain email to publish 3 technical differentiators, migration benchmarks, or a head-to-head buyer sandbox offer on this comparison page:
+ Submit Fastyr Official Differentiators & Case Study →Pricing notes & tier schedules
Centralize: Free plan · From $49/mo
The commercial model operates on a per-seat software-as-a-service subscription. A entry-level tier is available at $0 per month, granting individual reps access to 5 standard accounts with baseline mapping and LinkedIn sync.
- Free / Sandbox ($0, 1–2 seats (Evaluation)): Entry free tier with capped usage or feature quotas for initial workflow testing.
- Pro ($49/mo, 1–2 seats): The GPS. Intelligence on every deal.
- Per-Seat Linear Scaling: Centralize prices licenses on a per-user/seat basis (Free plan · From $49/mo); expanding from 2 to 15+ operators multiplies base recurring spend linearly.
- Credit & Usage Burn Multiplier: Workflows on Centralize consume metered credits or usage quotas; voice/media minutes, multi-step synthesis, or high-frequency runs can exhaust base allocations and trigger mid-cycle top-up packs.
Fastyr: From $1,200/yr
Commercial procurement for Fastyr begins from $1200/year, with operational pricing structured around managed workspace tiers.
- Credit & Usage Burn Multiplier: Workflows on Fastyr consume metered credits or usage quotas; multi-provider enrichment lookups, scraping runs, or bulk batch jobs can exhaust base allocations and trigger mid-cycle top-up packs.
- Enterprise Governance & Add-On Gating: Advanced capabilities such as Single Sign-On (SSO), custom role permissions, or specialized analytics modules are gated behind upper tiers or paid add-ons.
Frequently asked questions: Centralize vs Fastyr
How does Centralize pricing compare to Fastyr in 2026?
Centralize is listed at Free plan · From $49/mo (freemium, free plan), whereas Fastyr is listed at From $1,200/yr (subscription, no free plan disclosed).
How do Centralize and Fastyr compare on AI autonomy and moat depth?
On the MarTechRadar L1–L5 scale, Centralize is rated L3 · Conditional automation with a Proprietary moat moat (3.5/5.0), while Fastyr is rated L3 · Conditional automation with a Workflow-embedded moat (2.9/5.0).
Which teams are Centralize and Fastyr built for?
Centralize is a Web SaaS product in Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs designed for B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps). Fastyr is a Web SaaS product in Autonomous B2B Sales Agents & AI BDRs designed for B2B Sales Leaders, SDR/BDR Teams, Revenue Operations (RevOps).
What are the main limitations of Centralize vs Fastyr?
For Centralize: Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Social Graph Freshness: LinkedIn synchronization depends on Chrome extensions and user-initiated authentications, creating stale network graphs whenever reps fail to refresh individual browser sessions. For Fastyr: Operational considerations and platform boundaries include: Credit Consumption Boundaries: Agent operations remain strictly bounded by allocated computational credit pools, requiring supplemental credit packs or plan upgrades when high-volume campaigns encounter unexpected verification loops.
What are the hidden TCO drivers and contract negotiation levers for Centralize vs Fastyr?
For Centralize: Per-Seat Linear Scaling (Centralize prices licenses on a per-user/seat basis (Free plan · From $49/mo); expanding from 2 to 15+ operators multiplies base recurring spend linearly.) Negotiation lever: Validate exact quota thresholds (seats, credits, or API calls) included in Centralize's Free plan · From $49/mo tier before converting from monthly to annual billing. For Fastyr: Credit & Usage Burn Multiplier (Workflows on Fastyr consume metered credits or usage quotas; multi-provider enrichment lookups, scraping runs, or bulk batch jobs can exhaust base allocations and trigger mid-cycle top-up packs.) Negotiation lever: Negotiate price-lock protection on additional seats and overage credits above the From $1,200/yr entry tier.
Excerpts are quoted verbatim from each fact-checked review. Last updated Oct 14, 2026.